Bush Says "I'll Veto Any War-Funding Bill Containing Timetable for Iraq Withdrawal

President Bush on Friday said, "If the Congress wants to test my will as to whether I'll accept a timetable for withdrawal, I won't accept one," Bush said during a press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at Camp David, Md.

The president stood by his position to try and allow time for his strategy to work on the ground in Iraq, before setting a timetable.

"If they want to try again that which I've said is unacceptable, of course I wont accept it. I hope it won't come to that."

Bush has said after he vetoes the bill, he wants congressional leaders to come to the White House to discuss a "way forward" in Iraq.

The White House called the bill, "dead before arrival." The Senate passed the measure 51-46, 80 days after Bush sent his budget request to Congress.

Ladies and Gentlemen, 80 days? Does this not show the liberals in Washington are indeed playing politics by taking 80 days to craft and vote on a bill? It also shows how the Democrats do not care , knowing that their bill is dead before arrival on the President's desk. Two Republicans , 48 Democrats and one independent voted in favor of this bill.

"We have carried forth the wishes of the American people," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. (D-NV) What wishes are those? Do the American people want the troops not to be funded? Do they want our troops to not have the proper equipment? Knowing this bill is dead before arrival is not what the American people want. This coming from a man who was a known Klansman. How the people in Nevada elected a racist is beyond me. I think it's time for a change.

Let's pass a bill that is acceptable to the President and stop playing politics. The bill was a waste of time knowing it would be vetoed before it was ever passed. The bottom line is the only people that it is hurting is our troops and it is pretty apparent the Democrats do not care by sending this bill to the President's desk.

Iraq Bill Clears Congress Veto Awaits

In a wartime challenge to President Bush Congressional Democrats cleared legislation Thursday to begin withdraw of U.S. troops from Iraq by Oct 1 with a goal of complete withdraw six months later. Gee I wonder what message this is sending to the terrorists? As I have said before, do you think they are not watching this absurdity unfold? Are they not waiting so they can plan their next move? Why not just have the top ranking military leaders in Iraq let them know what their plans are as well. It is the same thing in reality. It is no different that what the liberal Democrats in Washington are doing.

In my opinion this is almost on the verge of treason. Harry Reid (D-NV) has said the "war is lost." The president will veto this legislation plain and simple. It calls for a time-table for withdraw and has more pork in it than a package of Jimmy Dean sausage. This my friends is exactly how the liberals undermine the President by adding things that only fit their political agenda. After President Bush vetoes this legislation, the liberals in Washington will spin this saying the President doesn't care about the troops, families etc. They also know they do not have a two-thirds majority in the House or Senate to override this veto.

The American People may be tired of this whole Iraq business, but I don't think they would compromise the safety and security of our troops or the nation as the Democrats have shown so far. Putting together legislation that undermines the troops effectiveness not only shows the ignorance of Libs, but shows they care less about our safety and security as well as this countrys.

Dennis Kucinich Plans to File Articles of Impeachment

Rep Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) has not found any sponsors for articles of impeachment against President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney that he plans to introduce Tuesday,but he said he encourages other members to read the charges. I wonder why you have not found any sponsors? The facts are clear you do not have any clear support, and have clearly demonstrated your lack of judgement and character. You as well as other liberal Democrats wish to undermine everything America stands for with your politics.

Kucinich is a 2008 presidential candidate. His proposal comes ahead of a series of protest this weekend calling for the impeachment of both Bush and Cheney. Dick Cheney on Tuesday returned to George Washington Hospital to have his leg checked out.

Kucinich had planned to explain the charges on Tuesday, but delayed because of Cheney's visit to the hospital. Why is there a delay if in fact these charges are legitimate? I find this to be no more than a "fishing expedition," except you have no bait on the hook. You wonder why you have no support? I know because the charges are "unfounded."

This whole fiasco is being brought up by the Democratic activists because they believe Bush and Cheney "misled the nation." Bush and Cheney never mislead the nation. The facts are clear to which they have stated numerous times , they went with the information that was given to them at the time. How can one mislead the nation with information that was given to them at the time may have proved false? The answer is simple it was not a lie. The liberal Democrats in Washington need to get a life and stop this non-sense once and for all. Democrats try and divide this country at every turn. One thing is true however when they do this. "A Nation divided against itself cannot stand." I find this nothing more than a political ploy to play politics instead of what is best for this country. I also feel you have no-chance to ever be President of the United States, not now not ever.

Giuliani Defends Comments on Terrorism

Rudy Giuliani has suggested the United States could face another terrorist attack if a Democrat is elected in 2008. Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) says Giuliani has taken politics to a new low and believe Americans are ready to reject those kinds of politics. What kind of politics Sen. Obama? Is it because he tells it like it is unlike the Democrats trying to spin and sugar coat every single issue, and undermine everything the President is trying to do?

Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) said protecting the country from terrorism "Shouldn't be a political football." I am just curious what you and your husband accomplished while in the White House? What good did you do for America? Former President William Clinton succeeded in almost bringing this country to its knees economically. He had Bin Laden handed to him twice and refused each time. What have you done to combat terrorism? You have done nothing. You and I both know it and so do the American People. You husband was to busy in the "Oral Orifice" not having sexual relations as he put it.

I support Giuliani in every way. He sees terrorism as a threat and wants to face them head on instead of trying diplomacy as the Democrats wish to do. Diplomacy has not worked in the past nor will it work in the future. I am sick and tired of the Democrats defeatist rhetoric and undermining America every step of the way.

Rep Hunter tells Harry Reid to step down as Senate Majority Leader

Duncan Hunter (R-CA) the ranking Republican in the House Armed Services Committee called on the Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to step down over his comments that the "war is lost."

Rep. Hunter- a 2008 presidential candidate-wrote in a letter that Reid's comments "can have no effect but to demoralize the brave men and women, who are honorably fulfilling their mission in Iraq, and to encourage our adversaries."

Rep Hunter, I think you are right on and I wish more members of Congress would stand up and be counted on this issue. Harry Reid needs to resign. He is nothing more than a Benedict Arnold, by letting the terrorists know of our plans in advance. His defeatist rhetoric is doing no good for our nation, or the troops on the ground.

Rep. Hunter went on to say, "Even if you sincerely believe it to be true, your pronouncement of failure will undoubtedly be used by terrorist leader to rally their followers-inevitably leading to increased attacks on the US and coalition forces." It will indeed cause just this Harry Reid. Why not just call the terrorist on the telephone? Better yet, just email them. I am sure they are watching your fiasco as much as the American People are. It's time for you to go "Dingy Harry." You are a traitor and do not deserve to be in the Senate or be the Majority Leader.

Obama says Giuliani Shouldnt Say U.S. faces an Attack if Democrat is Elected

Obama (D-IL) has no clue on this issue. After the attack on the World Trade Centers in 1993 it was treated as a police action. Who was President at the time? I believe it was none other than "Slick Willy" Clinton. Maybe he was to busy in the "Oral Orifice" to even really care. I am sure it is not the first time he did it, nor the last.

By taking this as police action it puts everyone on the defensive. It makes people sit by and not take action until action is taken against them. Clinton knew Bin Laden was the so called "Mastermind," but took no action, not once, but twice. He had him handed to him on a silver platter and refused.

Giuliani has said " We will remain on offense" trying to anticipate what the terrorist are going to do and "trying to stop them before they do it." I agree with that statement 100 percent. Are the American people going to sit here and listen to these liberal morons undermining everything we do to try and stop terrorism? I say no. Stand up and be heard. Let your Senators know how you feel. I will agree the American People may be tired of this Iraq episode. We do however have to finish what we started unlike the liberal morons in Washington, who wish to micro-manage this war just as they did in Vietnam.

House Speaker Pelosi Wont Attend Briefing

The House and Senate are preparing to vote on the final conference report on the $124 billion troop funding bill, which mandates US troops withdraw from Iraq October 1 at the latest. General Patreaus is scheduled to brief lawmakers on Thursday.

News has spread, however, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) will not attend the briefing. Do you have something far more important to do? Do you not have the common courage to see these ridiculous ideas you and your liberal morons present are detrimental to say the least? You will fund the war but you put a time-table for ending it. Is it because you think with the majority it will pass? It may pass, but will be vetoed by President Bush. As I have stated before, you do not have two-thirds majority to override the veto. So I ask why are you wasting time on something that will be vetoed? The answer is simple. Liberals only care about their own ideas and to hell with anyone else's ideas. No normal person would vote for this bill with the things you and your Benedict Arnold cohorts have placed in the bill.

Pelosi also requested a one- on- one meeting with Patreaus, but was not able to be worked out. Are you to high and holy to attend the regular meeting with the other House Members?
Your absence not only is irresponsible but in my opinion it is a "Dereliction of Duty." You and your liberal cohorts keep trying to undermine every issue. Keep saying your defeatist rhetoric. The liberal views are the same now as when for 40 years the Liberals in Washington had control. It did not work then and it certainly wont work now. You and your liberal cohorts are nothing more than traitors to not only yourselves, but to the American People.

President Bush Stands Firm

President Bush is standing firm against a timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq. He said he will veto the latest bill in Congress.

President Bush said, " I am disappointed that the Democratic leadership has chosen this course." The Democrats chose to make a political statement rather than do what is right for the country. I find this not only to be demoralizing to the American People but also to the troops. Democrats would need a two-thirds majority to override a Presidential veto.

Democrats have said they will not back down and pointed to past remarks by the new Iraq commander General David Patraeus, and said security in Iraq needs a political solution. Are you NUTS? Did we not try a political solution before our troops went into Iraq? Did it work? The answer is no it did not. Again the Democrats want to again try diplomacy when dealing with terrorist and continually want to undermine the President every step of the way. This is how Liberalism works ladies and gentleman.

Sen. Harry Reid(D-NV) again his same defeatist rhetoric by saying, he likened Bush to President Lyndon Johnson who ordered more troops to Vietnam in an attempt "to save his political legacy." You are wrong again "Dingy Harry." The liberals in Washington at the time did it all on their own by not letting the troops finish their job there as well. The liberals cut funding, pulled the troops out at a critical time, made this country turn against the troops. In essence "Dingy Harry," you and all your liberal assassins are doing exactly the same thing. I am disgusted beyond belief, and you can day after day look yourself in the mirror with a clear conscience. Give me a break!


This issue is not Republican or Democrat. It is standing by the President Of The United States in a troubled time fighting terrorist. I ask you one thing in closing. Do you want to fight them there or do you want to fight them here and have another horrific tragedy like September 11th? Give the troops what they need and stop this nonsense about a certain withdraw time. Don't you think the terrorist are watching this as well? Diplomacy never worked with terrorist and it never will.

Republican Lawmaker says "Listen to Military on Iraq War"

As Democrats prepare for a showdown on Capitol Hill, Republican lawmaker warned they are making a grave mistake ; by not listening to season commanders. Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-FL) said "Catastrophe always follows when civilians turn a deaf ear to their military officers." This is one of the first sensible things I have heard in a long time. Where has Bill Young been all this time? Maybe the liberals had him tied up somewhere and he has finally escaped.

Young has also said he doesn't think it is a good idea for Congress to manage the conduct of the war. Bravo for you Mr. Young. Do we want another Vietnam on our hands? This is exactly what happened when the liberals were in charge during the Vietnam War. Do we want this to happen in Iraq as well? I for one say no.

Keep up the great work Mr Young. You have shown your stance takes guts and courage. Let the commanders run this war not the liberals in Washington, who wish to undermine this war at every opportunity and spew their defeatist rhetoric.

The Hypocrite Laurie David

Laurie David, the global warming activist, told Texas A&M students to change their "individual behavior." to use fewer resources to help battle global warming. An employee who worked at the Eastwood Airport, Richard Pawlik witnessed Laurie David fly in on a luxurious private jet. which could be seen ten miles away (clear day) due to the thick black smoke from the exhaust.

I want to point out Laurie David doesn't care about the environment, she only cares about her political agenda along with all the other liberals around the country. Liberals have the idea "Do as I say," Not as I do." All this is ladies and gentleman is at best a scam. It is all a way for them to push their political agenda time and time again. It's very clear to me that you are indeed a hypocrite saying one thing and doing the exact opposite.

House & Senate Agree on War-Funding Bill

The House and Senate negotiators reached an agreement today on war funding legislation that would bring the troops home as early as July. It also includes setting a goal of ending combat no later than March of next year.

The deal will come to final votes in the House and Senate on Wednesday and Thursday. President Bush has said in earlier statements he will veto it. Democrats considered making the dates advisory, hoping by doing this President Bush would sign the bill. Folks, he wont, he will veto it. Harry Reid (D-NV) said Bush "Is the only person who fails to face the wars reality." What reality is that "Dingy Harry?" Is it the reality that you are a quitter and would rather try diplomacy when dealing with terrorist than face them head on?

The reality of this issue you would rather quit on the American People as well as our troops who are fighting for freedom against these terrorist. Again you undermine everything there is to do with freedom and integrity.

Crow Calls For Limited Toilet Paper Usage

Singer Sheryl Crow says a ban on using to much toilet paper should be introduced to help the environment. She suggested each of us use "one square per restroom visit, except, on those pesky occasions where two or three would be required." I don't know about you folks, but one will not work for me and neither do I believe it works for most people.

She has teamed up with environmental activist Laurie David. Sheryl Crow says "I have spent the better part of this tour trying to come up with easy ways for all of us to become a part of the solution to global warming." Crow goes on to say "Although my ideas are in the earliest stages of development, they are, in my mind worth investigating."

In my opinion she should stick to singing and not involve herself in politics. She not only shows how ignorant she really is, but gives other environmental wackos idiotic ideas as well. Seriously folks if everyone had to use one sheet of toilet paper, it would probably cause disease and sickness from dirty hygiene. Toilet paper is bio-degradable. You did not mention this part did you? This is where liberal thinking has taken us, straight into the toilet. Stick to singing Sheryl it is what you do best.

President Bush Backs Gonzales

President Bush today gave a strong vote of confidence to Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez. "This is an honest and honorable man in whom I have confidence," Bush said. The President said Gonzalez's testimony before the judiciary committee increased his confidence. I believe in every aspect of supporting the President, but in this case I am not sure that I can. He responded to about a hundred questions with, "I don't know" or I don't recall"

Gonzalez had been under increased criticism for his handling of the firings of eight prosecutors, and about a key meeting he attended in November. Gonzalez has said he cannot remember anything about the meeting. Is his memory that bad? I can remember the first job I ever had, and he can't remember a key meeting? The Attorney Generals testimony was damaging to say the least. I believe his credibility was damaged beyond repair by his own actions.

Republicans as well have voiced concern whether or not Gonzalez can still do the job as Attorney General. The President of the United States continues to have confidence, but I am not so sure the American People still do.